Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nandita Sikka Vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 3151/2022 & CM APPL. 9168/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/02/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Nandita Sikka Vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court)

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned notice has been issued without approval of the competent authority as per Section 151 of the Act. He states that the approval has not only been obtained from an incompetent authority but has also been obtained after a lapse of four years from the relevant assessment year. In support of his submissions, he relies on the judgment and order passed by the Orissa High Court in M/s.Ambika Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Others in WP(C) 20919/2021.

Issue notice. Ms.Manise Jain, learned counsel for the respondents, accepts notice. She prays for and is permitted to file a counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing. Till further orders, there shall be a stay of the reassessment proceedings issued pursuant to the notice dated 31st march 2021.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT

Present writ petition has been filed challenging the notice dated 31st March, 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’] for the assessment year 2015-16.

Delhi HC Granted Stay for Notice issued on the basis of Approval from Incompetent Authority

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned notice has been issued without approval of the competent authority as per Section 151 of the Act. He states that the approval has not only been obtained from an incompetent authority but has also been obtained after a lapse of four years from the relevant assessment year. In support of his submissions, he relies on the judgment and order passed by the Orissa High Court in M/s. Ambika Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Others in WP(C) 20919/2021.

Issue notice. Ms.Manise Jain, learned counsel for the respondents, accepts notice. She prays for and is permitted to file a counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing.

Till further orders, there shall be a stay of the reassessment proceedings issued pursuant to the notice dated 31st March, 2021.

List on 17 th October, 2022.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court [email protected], 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delhi HC Quashes Section 148 Notices Due to Approval by Incompetent Authority under Taxation & Relaxation Law Non-Furnishing of Section 151 Approval Reasons Fatal to Reopening: SC Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A Notes of account do form part of Balance Sheet: Supreme Court Bombay HC Quashes AY 2013-14 Notices Post 31-03-2021, Rules TOLA Not Applicable View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930