Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Delay Miscalculated, NFAC Must Rehear Appeal on Grants, Interest Income

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 5767
Case Name
Madhya Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement

Madhya Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad bench has partly allowed and remanded two appeals filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited (MGVCL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam, back to the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC). The ITAT’s decision on one appeal notably highlighted that the due date for filing an appeal should be calculated from the date the assessment order is served on the assessee, not merely from its issuance date.

Appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18 (ITA No. 109/Ahd/2025)

For Assessment Year 2017-18, MGVCL had initially filed its return of income on October 31, 2017. The assessment was completed on December 19, 2019, but was later set aside by the Pr. CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on March 31, 2022, for a de-novo verification. The Assessing Officer then completed the re-assessment on March 30, 2023, assessing the total income at Rs. 3,36,54,10,621/-.

MGVCL appealed this order to the CIT(A), NFAC. However, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal solely on grounds of delay, calculating the due date from the assessment order’s issuance date of March 30, 2023, and concluding a delay of 115 days.

Before the ITAT, the company’s Authorized Representative (AR) argued that there was no actual delay. The AR asserted that while the assessment order was issued on March 30, 2023, it was served on the assessee on August 7, 2023. Based on the service date, the due date for filing the appeal was September 15, 2023. Since the assessee filed the appeal on August 25, 2023, it was well within the prescribed time limit. The AR contended that the CIT(A) erroneously ignored this crucial aspect of service date.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,758

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.