Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs La Solitaire Jewels Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs La Solitaire Jewels Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) No Defect in Books, No Section 68 Addition – Tribunal Affirms CIT(A) Relief to Jewellery Firm- Increase in Cash Sales Not Enough to Doubt Genuineness – Revenue filed appeal against order of CIT(A)/NFAC, New Delhi dated 22.11.2023, deleting addition of ₹8.30 crore made u/s 68 on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period. Assessee, a jeweller, had declared income of ₹61.11 lakh. AO noted cash deposits of ₹8.30 crore during November–December 2016, representing a 1349% increase in cash sales compared to the preceding yea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails When AO Taxes a Different Income Than the One Recorded in Reasons ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Only Profit Element Matters, Not Entire Commodity Transaction Value ITAT Upholds Denial of Section 80GGC Deduction for Donations to Alleged Accommodation Entry Political Party SBI Wins LTC TDS Dispute: No Assessee-in-Default When Bank Followed High Court Orders ITAT: Profit Cannot Be Estimated Arbitrarily Merely Because Books Were Not Produced View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930