Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nordex India Pvt  Ltd Vs DCIP (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : IT(TP)A No. 265/Bang/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Nordex India Pvt  Ltd Vs DCIP (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that if two out of the three preceding assessment year the comparable has earned profits it cannot be held a persistent loss making company. Hence, persistent loss filter can be applied only if there is loss in three successive assessment years.

Facts- Assessee is a company being wholly owned subsidiary of Acciona Windpower International S.L., Spain. The assessee aggregated the purchases of raw materials and purchase of fixed assets under manufacturing segment.

The only segment disputed by the TPO was in the manufacturing segment. It was noted by the TPO that assessee computed its margin under the manufacturing segment to be 5.83%. Assessee selected six comparable with a median of 5.47% thereby treating its transaction to be at arm’s length under the manufacturing segment. Disagreeing with the transfer pricing study, the TPO applied certain filters and shortlisted the comparables with a mean of 11.62%. Accordingly, TPO proposed an adjustment of Rs. 30,14,11,018/- to be the shortfall.

DRP upheld the observations of the TPO and rejected the objections raised by the assessee. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031