Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manoj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Commission Agent’s Cash Flow Needs Verification- ₹3.94 Cr Cash Deposit Addition Remanded: ITAT Delhi Gives Assessee One More Chance Manoj Kumar, engaged in business of mobile recharge coupons, filed appeal against NFAC order dated 03.11.2022 arising from assessment u/s 143(3) for AY 2017-18. AO noted cash deposits of ₹3,94,54,700 in Assessee’s Yes Bank & ICICI Bank accounts during demonetisation period. Assessee explained that he worked on commission basis for telecom distributors (Ezdhan, Vishesh Infosystem), collecting cash from local distributors ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031