Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Jaspal Singh Saluja (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Jaspal Singh Saluja (ITAT Delhi) Revenue challenged deletion of Rs.25.24 crore added by AO u/s 68 on account of cash deposits treated as unexplained cash credits. Assessee, a retailer of electronic items & mobile phones, had branches at Delhi, Haridwar & Hyderabad for part of the year, & deposited total cash of Rs.31.62 crore which he explained as cash sales transferred to the Ghaziabad head office. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, Assessee produced complete documentary evidence-cash books, ledgers, bank statements, month-wise branch-wise cash sales & purchases, VAT/GST returns, inv...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930