This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CIT(A) Admits Evidence but Says Nothing: Matter Sent Back to AO
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- AKM Associates Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2022-23
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
AKM Associates Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Assessee, in its first year of business, faced estimation of net profit @2% by AO. During appellate proceedings, Assessee furnished additional evidences before CIT(A), which were admitted and even subjected to remand proceedings. However, CIT(A) failed to adjudicate or record any finding on such additional evidences and mechanically sustained AO’s NP estimation @2%.
ITAT held that once additional evidences are admitted and remand report is called for, CIT(A) is duty-bound to deal with them by a reasoned order. Sustaining estimation without...






