Follow Us :

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bomi S. Billimoria Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA NO. 2120/MUM/1998
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2009
Related Assessment Year : 1993-94

The assessee, an employee of Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) India, received from J&J, USA, on 12.7.1989 a “cashless” option to buy 2500 shares at the then prevailing market price of $ 57.88 per share. The options were exercisable in installments over 10 years starting 11.7.1991. On 13.8.1992 (AY 1993-94), the assessee ‘sold’ the options and made a gain of Rs. 5,44,925. The AO held that the said gain was assessable in AY 1993-94 as either salary, short-term capital gain or speculation profit. On appeal, the CIT (A) held that the ‘shares’ obtained under the ESOP were a capital asset and as they were held for less than 3 years, the gain was assessable as a STCG. He rejected the argument that as there was no ‘cost of acquisition’, the capital gains were not assessable. On further appeal, HELD, allowing the appeal:

(i) As the CIT (A) had held that the shares acquired under ESOP amounted to acquisition of a capital asset, one had to proceed on that premise;

(ii) In granting approval to the ESOP, the RBI had stipulated that no payment could be made while exercising the right to purchase shares. Accordingly, there was no “cost of acquisition” and in accordance with B. C. Srinivasa Setty 128 ITR 294 (SC), the gains could not be taxed;

(iii) Even if it is assumed that the market value of the share is the benefit given to the assessee, such benefit can be said to accrue to the assessee only on the date of exercise of the option. As the date of exercise of the option as well as the date of sale is the same, there was no difference between the “deemed cost of acquisition” and the actual price realized by the assessee and thus there was no taxable gain.

NF

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Shailesh says:

    This should be a landmark case..Can anyone clarify what this means for ESOPs granted by Parent company based in US and stocks listed in US StockExchange to Indian employees of the Indian subsidiary of the company ?

    After FBT abolished my company’s interpretation is that ESOP benefits are classified as Perks now and the company is still liable to cut TDS at the rate of 30% on any ESOPs exercised.

    In above case…court says ESOPs cannot be taxed but here the companies are treating it as a perk n taxing it at the highest slab rate possible ??

    Pls clarify.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
May 2024
MTWTFSS
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031