Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Uppalaiah Ravula Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Uppalaiah Ravula Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT held that additions made in the hands of an individual partner on account of cash receipts found and impounded during survey proceedings under Section 133A were unsustainable, as the receipts pertained to transactions of the partnership firm and not to the assessee in his individual capacity. The assessee, an LIC commission agent and a partner in M/s. Srinidhi Real Estate and Constructions, was subjected to reassessment on the basis of impounded material showing receipt of Rs. 50,00,000 for AY 2015–16 and Rs. 47,00,000...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031