Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rabiul Islam Gain Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rabiul Islam Gain Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) No Protective Addition Once Real Owner Is Identified: Kolkata ITAT Deletes ₹6.93 Cr Cash Deposit Addition Employee’s Bank Account, Employer’s Money-  Protective Addition Fails When Substantive Assessment Is Complete  Kolkata ITAT ‘D’ Bench in Rabiul Islam Gain vs ITO (ITA No.1485/Kol/2025) and Tapan Kumar Pal vs DCIT (ITA No.1487/Kol/2025), AY 2013-14, order dated 23-12-2025, allowed both appeals and deleted protective additions of ₹6.93 crore (cash deposits) and related interest, holding that once the real owner of the money is identified ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031