This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Camouflaging of Loan to Director as commercial transaction: Invocation of s. 2(22)(e) justified
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri Hemanth Kumar Bothra Vs. The Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013- 2014
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Shri Hemanth Kumar Bothra Vs. ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
A careful perusal of the copy of the Memorandum of Understanding [Refer: Paper Book of the assessee], we find that the assessee had himself signed on behalf of NIPL (purchaser) and for himself (seller). The authenticity of the so called MOU cannot also be cross verified as it was not registered with the registering authority. Thus, the AO’s observation that “the explanation [of the assessee] is a self serving argument….” [Para 5 of the asst. order] cannot be brushed aside. The assessee’s argument that due to fall...
