Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kothari Credit (India) Limited Vs Union Of India And ORS. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : WPO/1192/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/07/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kothari Credit (India) Limited Vs Union Of India and ORS. (Calcutta High Court)

In the case of Kothari Credit (India) Limited v. Union of India and others, the petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, the tax authorities had already passed an order under Section 147 of the Act, and the petitioner had availed the alternative remedy by filing an appeal before the CIT (Appeals).

Kothari Credit (India) Limited filed a writ petition, WPO 1192 of 2023, before the Calcutta High Court challenging the validity of an order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This section pertains to the issue of notice under certain circumstances.

During the hearing of the writ petition, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Upadhyay, made a fair submission that an order under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act had already been passed by the tax authorities while the writ petition was pending before the court. Additionally, the petitioner had availed the alternative remedy by filing an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] against the assessment order passed under Section 147.

Taking into account the petitioner’s submission and the fact that the appeal against the assessment order had already been filed before the CIT(A), the Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition (WPO 1192 of 2023) without passing any further order. It means that the court did not make any ruling on the merits of the case since the appropriate remedy was already pursued by the petitioner through the appeal process before the CIT(A).

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Considering the very fair submission of Mr. Upadhyay, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition challenging the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, order under Section 147 of the Act has already been passed and against which petitioner has already availed alternative remedy by way of filing appeal before the CIT (Appeals) concerned, this writ petition being WPO 1192 of 2023 is disposed of without passing any further order.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Raj says:

    03-Apr-2020 — Answer: If assessee does not receive any intimation from CPC Bangalore u/s 143 (1) or 154, then assessee — can call toll free number,8509489633 at 1800 103 …
    General Queries related to Income Tax: Aayakar Sampark Kendra (ASK)
    Purpose: Help Desk

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728