Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Hariprasad Bhojnagarwala (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Gujarat High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Provisions of section 23(2) make it clear that benefits of relief in respect of self-occupied property is available only to owner who can reside in his own residence, that means, benefit of relief is available to self-occupied property only to an individual assessee and not to an imaginary assessable entity/fictional entity such as a partnership firm. Various High Court decisions denying relief under section 23(2) to partnership firms cannot be invoked to deny relief to a HUF since unlike a firm which is a fictional entity and cannot physically reside and so cannot claim benefit of provision, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
