Case Law Details
Case Name : Crawford Bayley & Company Vs Union of India & Others (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Though the Income Tax Department made a provision for electronic filing of returns, it appears that the ITR-V Form containing the due verification of the return of the assessee was required to be remitted only by ordinary post. The instructions which were furnished to assessees, a copy of which has been placed on record, specifically stipulate that the ITR-V form should not be sent either by registered post or by speed post or courier.
The assessee has furnished adequate material before the Court in support of its contention that having filed the return electronically, it had also submitted th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
my ITR acknowledgement is rejected due to late in submission (not dispatched within 120 days). what is the solution for this ?
Kindly note that despatch of ITR V by Speed Post mode is allowed – you may check the ITR V itself. I have myself been filing several ITR V Forms by Speed Post and the acknowledgments are duly updated on the site.
I HAVE TRANSMITTING THE DATA IN THE RETURN ELECTRONICALLY ON 29/03/12 IN WHICH IHAVE NOT PUSHED BUTTON OF CACULATION THEREFORE RESULTIN COLUM TOTAL IN SALARY RS 144000 WAS CACULATE IN INCOME WHILE IHAVE NOT RECIVED ANY SALARY INCOME. AFTER THAT I HAVE SEND REVISED E RETURN BUT TILL TODAY IHAVE NOT SEND BOTH VERIFICATION OF THE RETURN IN RETURN FORM V. CAN I FILE THE CORRECT RETURN IN APAPER FORM. OR BEST SOLUTION. MYTOTAL INCOME WAS RS120000 WHILE DUE TO CLERICAL MISTAKE(NOT PUSH OF CALCULATIN BUTTON)INCOME CALCULATE RS 121000+144000=261000. WHAT SHOULD IDO BEST
Comments of MR,V.S. Rajagopalan appears to be correct . The work of outsourced agency requires monitoring .
CA. Subhash Chandra Podder
28/12/2011
In a similar situation the AO rejected the second ITR V submitted stating that it was received late.
Subsequently a revised return was filed. After that an ack was received informing the receipt of the first ITR V in time and also the assessment order for the same. Now the assessee is confused whether to send the revised ITR V to Bangalore or not. This is how even the outsourced agency is working.