Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Crawford Bayley & Company Vs Union of India & Others (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 2004 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/12/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Though the Income Tax Department made a provision for electronic filing of returns, it appears that the ITR-V Form containing the due verification of the return of the assessee was required to be remitted only by ordinary post. The instructions which were furnished to assessees, a copy of which has bee

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. shweta jain says:

    my ITR acknowledgement is rejected due to late in submission (not dispatched within 120 days). what is the solution for this ?

  2. Rathin Roy says:

    Kindly note that despatch of ITR V by Speed Post mode is allowed – you may check the ITR V itself. I have myself been filing several ITR V Forms by Speed Post and the acknowledgments are duly updated on the site.

  3. sanjay kumar says:

    I HAVE TRANSMITTING THE DATA IN THE RETURN ELECTRONICALLY ON 29/03/12 IN WHICH IHAVE NOT PUSHED BUTTON OF CACULATION THEREFORE RESULTIN COLUM TOTAL IN SALARY RS 144000 WAS CACULATE IN INCOME WHILE IHAVE NOT RECIVED ANY SALARY INCOME. AFTER THAT I HAVE SEND REVISED E RETURN BUT TILL TODAY IHAVE NOT SEND BOTH VERIFICATION OF THE RETURN IN RETURN FORM V. CAN I FILE THE CORRECT RETURN IN APAPER FORM. OR BEST SOLUTION. MYTOTAL INCOME WAS RS120000 WHILE DUE TO CLERICAL MISTAKE(NOT PUSH OF CALCULATIN BUTTON)INCOME CALCULATE RS 121000+144000=261000. WHAT SHOULD IDO BEST

  4. CA. Subhash Chandra Podder says:

    Comments of MR,V.S. Rajagopalan appears to be correct . The work of outsourced agency requires monitoring .
    CA. Subhash Chandra Podder
    28/12/2011

  5. V.S.RAJAGOPALAN says:

    In a similar situation the AO rejected the second ITR V  submitted stating that it was received late.
    Subsequently  a revised return was filed. After that an ack was received informing the receipt of the first ITR V in time and also the assessment order for the same. Now the assessee is confused whether to send the revised ITR V  to Bangalore or not. This is how even the outsourced agency is working.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031