Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Anuradha Venkatesan Vs The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

IN THE ITAT CHENNAI BENCH ‘C’

Smt. Anuradha Venkatesan

Versus

Income-tax Officer

IT APPEAL NO. 952 (MDS.) OF 2011

[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07]

NOVEMBER 20, 2012

ORDER

S.S. Godara, Judicial Member

The assess

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. vswami says:

    “…the present assessee has not led any cogent proof of her intention to invest the consideration amount in the REC bonds and efforts undertaken in pursuance of the same. Therefore, same is distinguishable….”.

    As is clear from above,and neceassrily immplied,in a case where assessee has proved that non-comliance of the subject requirement within the timeframe was for reasons beyond his control, then the relief cannot be rightly denied.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31