Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Upneet Singh Arneja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Upneet Singh Arneja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Quashes Reassessment – Approval Taken from Wrong Authority Renders 148 Notice Invalid Delhi allowed the appeal of Upneet Singh Arneja by holding that reassessment initiated beyond three years from end of AY 2016-17 was invalid as approval was obtained from Pr. CIT instead of Pr. Chief Commissioner/Director General as mandated u/s 151. Assessee, proprietor of M/s Kanika Herbals, originally filed return on 17.10.2016 declaring income of ₹4,43,800/-. Return was held invalid by CPC. Later, a belated return was filed on 16.04.2018 declaring sam...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930