Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ajay Jain (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Ajay Jain (ITAT Delhi) Written submissions are not additional evidence- No Violation of Rule 46A When All Evidence Was Already Before AO- This Revenue appeal concerned the order of CIT(A) arising from an ex-parte assessment u/s 144. The only grievance of the Department before the Tribunal was that the CIT(A) had allegedly admitted additional evidence without following the procedure prescribed under Rule 46A. Assessee’s counsel clarified that no new evidence was filed before the CIT(A). All relevant records had already been placed before the AO during assessment proceedings, includin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930