Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harish Kumar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harish Kumar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Reopening quashed: AO assumed non-filing despite return on record; reasons held factually incorrect; appeal partly allowed In this appeal by Harish Kumar Singh for AY 2012-13, Tribunal examined the validity of assessment framed u/s 147 after reopening based on AIR information of cash deposits of ₹51.07 lakh. AO recorded reasons alleging that assessee was a “non-filer” & had not filed any return for the relevant year, obtained approval, issued notice u/s 148 & completed reassessment. At the outset, Tribunal addressed a procedural objection re...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031