This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
AO cannot be uncertain in penalty order as to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- HPCL Mittal Energy Ltd. Vs The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Amritsar)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Amritsar
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
HPCL Mittal Energy Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Amritsar)
The moot question is that what should be the nature of specification of a charge by the AO at the stage of initiation of penalty proceedings and at the time of passing the penalty order. Is the AO required to specify in the penalty notice/order as to whether it is a case of `concealment of particulars of income’; or `furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income’; or both of them, which can be expressed by using the word `and’ between the two expressions. When the AO is satisfied that it is a clear-cut case of conceal...
