Case Law Details
Case Name : Birla Sunlife Asset Management Company v. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Court :Mumbai bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
Citation : Birla Sunlife Asset Management Company v. ITO [2010] 38 SOT 523 (MUM),
Brief :Asset management company can be treated as an agent of its non-resident investors under section 163 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
Facts of the case
• The taxpayer an asset management company of a mutual fund, made payments to the investors residing in United Arab Emirates (UAE), upon redemption of units of a debt scheme of a Mutual Fund, without any deduction of tax at source.
• The Assessing officer held the taxpayer to be an agent of s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

