Case Law Details
Case Name : Jitendra Mansukhlal Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Contention of the Assessee- Provision of Sec. 40(a)(ia) shall apply only in respect of the amounts payable at the end of the year and shall not apply on the amounts actually paid by the appellant during the year.
Contention of the Revenue– Ld. DR submitted that disallowance has to be made irrespective of the fact that whether payment is made during the year or not and for this purpose Ld. DR has relied upon the decision of Mumbai Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Pratibhuti Viniyog Ltd. order dated 22/08/2014 in ITA No.1689/Mum/2011.
We have heard both the parties and their contentions ha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

