Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s.Fernhill Laboratories and Industrial Establishment (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 5615 OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

 From the above circular, it would be clear that the amendment bringing self generated intangible assets such as trademark to capital gains tax only with effect from Assessments Year 2002-03 onwards. In this   case, we are concerned with Assessment Year 1999-2000 and therefore, the amendment would not have any effect. Further as held by the Supreme Court in the matter of Dy. CIT v/s. Core Health Care ltd. reported in 298 ITR 194 that a provision introduced with effect from a particular date would not have retrospective effect unless it is expressly stated to be so. Consequently, the sale of self generated trade marks during the Assessment year 1999-2000 are not chargeable to capital gains tax. So far as the sale of self generated designs (i.e. not acquired) the same is also not chargeable to capital gains tax not only for the reasons applicable to trade marks but for the fact that even till this date, no amendment has been made to Section 55(2) of the said Act defining cost of acquisition of design as in the case of trademark goodwill etc.

HIGH COURT OF  BOMBAY

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5615 OF 2010

Commissioner of Income Tax

Vs.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031