Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Dilip Manichand Nahar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri Dilip Manichand Nahar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT held that The reason explained by the assessee in both the notarized affidavits that the appeal was not filed on the advice of his Consultant does not constitute a sufficient cause to condone the delay of 807 days, thus the reasons stated in both the notarized affidavits are not acceptable and consequently, the delay of 807 days is not condoned. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT PUNE This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 07-12-2015 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Aurangabad [‘CIT(A)’] for assessment year 20...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930