Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gearbulk AG, In re. (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : AAR No. 803 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Facts

  • The applicant is a non-resident shipping Company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland and is in the business of shipping contracts for the transportation of cargo worldwide. During the financial years 2007-08 and 2008-09, the applicant entered into a shipping contract for transportation of cargo from Indian ports to China.
  • The amount of freight for transportation of cargo from the Indian port to a port outside India was invoiced and received by the applicant.
  • For the relevant years the applicant appointed a port agent in India for handing the cargo. The port agent on behalf of the applicant, deposited tax at 7.5% of the freight charges received by the applicant, under section 172 of the Income tax Act, 1961(„the Act?)
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031