Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Taegu Tec India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Taegu Tec India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The ITAT Bangalore held that where an addition made through intimation u/s 143(1) is subsequently deleted in appeal, the assessment order u/s 143(3) based on such adjusted income cannot be sustained, and the income must revert to the returned income. In this case, the assessee filed its return declaring income of ₹63.92 crore. However, the CPC while processing the return made an adjustment of ₹45.64 crore under Section 143(1) due to an alleged mismatch between the return and the tax audit report, resulting in a total income of ₹109...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031