Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Taegu Tec India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Taegu Tec India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The ITAT Bangalore held that where an addition made through intimation u/s 143(1) is subsequently deleted in appeal, the assessment order u/s 143(3) based on such adjusted income cannot be sustained, and the income must revert to the returned income. In this case, the assessee filed its return declaring income of ₹63.92 crore. However, the CPC while processing the return made an adjustment of ₹45.64 crore under Section 143(1) due to an alleged mismatch between the return and the tax audit report, resulting in a total income of ₹109...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930