Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ameetsingh Ajitsingh Rajpal Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ameetsingh Ajitsingh Rajpal Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) Farmhouse vs Residential House Dispute – Additional Evidence Admitted- Pune ITAT Remands 54F Claim Assessee, engaged in real-estate business, filed return at Nil. Assessment u/s 143(3) resulted in additions including denial of deduction u/s 54F amounting to Rs.92,85,214/-. AO held that investment was not made in a “residential house” but in a farmhouse. CIT(A)/NFAC deleted additions relating to interest & unsecured loans u/s 68, but upheld the denial of 54F exemption. Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that the authorities below erred...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031