Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anjali Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anjali Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Conclusion: Addition on account of unexplained investments under section 69 could not be made as whatever deposits were made were either out of the past savings or from the loans taken from relatives. Held: Assessee was staying in a small village, which was a five-hour journey from Kolkata, and had been assessed to tax only on the ground that during demonetisation, a credit of roughly Rs.10 lakhs was reflected in her account. AO made an addition under section 69 by holding that it was an unexplained investment of assessee in the Bank account. Thus, assessee app...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930