Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition u/s 68 sustained as genuineness of transaction in shares not proved

Case Law Details

Case Name
Meenu Ajay Pathak Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Meenu Ajay Pathak Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that addition of unexplained investment u/s 68 sustained as genuineness of transaction in shares not proved. Further, SEBI also found manipulative trade executed in entities to whom shares were sold by the assessee. Facts- During the year, the assessee has shown exempted long-term capital gain of Rs.86,03,271, in the return of income filed by her on the sale of scrips of M/s Sunrise Asian Ltd. During the assessment proceedings, AO considered the information received from the Investigation Wing as well as the statement recorded, during the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *