Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Himanshu Botadara Vs ITO (ITAT Indore)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 155 & 156/Ind/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/12/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Himanshu Botadara Vs ITO (ITAT Indore)

ITAT Indore held that addition u/s. 68 on account of bogus long term capital gains unsustainable as the alleged transaction is not found recorded in the books of accounts including the Dmat account of the assessee. Hence, addition on the basis of assumption unsustainable.

Facts- The assessee HUF and Proprietor of Anjay Coal Company is engaged in the business of reporting and monitoring as agencies as well as deriving income from purchase and sale of share and securities.

AO reopened the assessment by issuing a notice u/s 148, for assessing the income escaped assessment on account of bogus transaction of purchase and sale of shares of M/s. Twenty First Century India Limited. In response to notice u/s 148, the assessee filed return of income on 18.4.2018, declaring the same income as it was declared in the original return of income. The AO completed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act on 24th December, 2018, whereby an addition u/s 68 of the Act was made to the tune of Rs. 2,09,239/- being bogus long term capital gains.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031