Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Chunakhali Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samiti Limited (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Chunakhali Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samiti Limited (ITAT Kolkata) Rule 46A Mandatory: Kolkata ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A)’s Cryptic Deletion of ₹2.83 Cr u/s 69B Appellate Power Is Wide, But Procedure Can’t Be Ignored-  No Shortcuts Under Rule 46A:Cryptic Relief Set Aside—AO Must Get Chance to Examine Evidence- Deletion Without Remand Won’t Stand Judicial Scrutiny- ITAT Restores ₹2.83 Cr Investment Case Kolkata ITAT ‘A’ Bench in ITO Vs. Chunakhali Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samiti Ltd. [ITA No. 803/KOL/2025, AY 2018-19, order dated 31.12.2025] allowed Revenue’s appeal and set asi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031