Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinubhai Keshavbhai Rabadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vinubhai Keshavbhai Rabadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

Huge Agricultural Income Accepted as Genuine  – No Contrary Evidence from AO – Onus Discharged, Addition Unsustainable

Assessee declared agricultural income of ₹26,20,240 for AY 2016-17, compared to ₹4,04,995 in preceding year. AO treated ₹20,65,295 as unexplained “excess” agricultural income & disallowed expenses, alleging inflated claim. CIT(A) confirmed the addition.

Before Tribunal, Assessee explained that agricultural land was jointly held with family

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats Between Third Parties Not Evidence Against Company Without Corroboration Overtime Wages Must Include Allowances Under Factories Act: SC Commission Addition Deleted for Lack of Proof of Accommodation Entries: ITAT Delhi Double Taxation Bar Invoked to Delete Interest TP Adjustment: ITAT Delhi Once Section 263 Order Is Quashed, Fresh Assessment Cannot Survive: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031