This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
In absence of any material seized during search, Revenue cannot seek afresh examination of the valuation of the property
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Vs. Smt. Anita Rani (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Court is of the opinion that there is no infirmity with the ITAT order which essentially held that the valuation by the banker, who provided credit could well be different from the valuation report for the transaction given that the assessee had purchased the property long ago. In other words, the absence of any material seized during the search proceeding could not have justified afresh examination of the valuation issue.
1. The assessee had filed its return for AY 2008-09 and inter alia reported sale of its capital asset – acquired in 1974. Although assessment was completed, further appeal...






I am unable to download the judgment nor it is availble on the Website of Delhi High Court