Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arvind Murjani Brands Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2382/Ahd/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case- ITAT Ahmedabad held in the case of Arvind Murjani Brands Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT that As the amount on which tax was deducted at source is not at all chargeable to tax, then the command of section 199 will have to be harmoniously and pragmatically read as providing for allowing credit for the tax deducted at source in the year of the receipt of the amount, on which tax was deducted at source.

Facts of the case-

The Assessing Officer did not allow thecredit of TDS on theground that the tax has been deducted on the rent received by the assessee. The assessee has not offered the rent as the incomeof the assessee and therefore, the credit for TDS cannot be allowed. The same is sustained by CIT (A)

 Contention of Revenue:

The assessee has not offered the rent as the income of the assessee and therefore, the credit for TDS cannot be allowed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. rajesh kumar arora says:

    Sir
    Good Evening

    My question is maximum limit of cash bill raise of daily basis , or no limit of cash blll please clear my point

    Thanks

    Rajesh

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031