This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
S. 194H TDS not deductible on Sub-Brokerage on buying / selling of units of mutual funds
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dy. Commissioner of Income- tax – 2(3) Vs. M/s S.J. Investment Agencies P. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITAT MUMBAI BENCH ‘E’
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax – 2(3), Mumbai
Versus
S.J. Investment Agencies (P.) Ltd.
IT Appeal Nos. 8317 & 8322 (Mum.) of 2010
[ASSESSMENT YEARS 2005-06 & 2007-08 ]
Date of Pronouncement – 02.01.2013
ORDER
Dinesh Kumar Agarwal, Judicial Member
These two appeals preferred by the Revenue are directed against the common order dtd. 21-9-2010 passed by the ld. CIT(A) – 6, Mumbai for assessment years 2005-06 & 2007-08. Since facts are identical and common issue is involved, both these appeals are disposed of by this common order fo...
MUTUAL FUND BROKERAGE IS EXAMPTED FOR TDS. I WANT THAT SEBI CIRCULAR IN WHICH IT WAS CLERIFY. SO PLEASE SEND IT TO MY EMAIL
ARN-59196