Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : BPTP Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
BPTP Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee filed appeal against the order of CIT(A), which upheld intimation u/s 143(1) issued by CPC, Bangalore. The principal issue was whether the intimation dated 27.02.2023 was barred by limitation as per the fifth proviso to section 143(1). Assessee filed its return of income for AY 2021-22 on 15.03.2022. Under the proviso to section 143(1), no intimation can be issued after expiry of nine months from the end of the financial year in which the return is made. Therefore, the statutory limitation for sending intimation expired on 31.12.2022. Assessee produce...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930