Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Kansai Nerolac Paints Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Appeal Number : Order No. GST-ARA-84/2018-19/B-30
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/03/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Kansai Nerolac Paints Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)

Question: Whether value of supply of goods by one distinct entity (Factory/depot) as defined under sec 25(4) of the CGST Act 2017 as amended to another distinct entity (Factory/depot) can be determined on the basis of our cost of production. Our cost of production depends mainly on cost of inputs and input services hence the same fluctuates with the price of inputs and input services.

Answer:-As discussed above applicant can apply Rule 28 of the GST Rules, 2017 to determine the value of supply of goods for supply of goods by one distinct entity (factory/depot) as defined u/s25(4) of the CGST Act to an other distinct entity having same PAN (factory/depot).

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s KANSAI NEROLAC PAINTS LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031