UP Trade Tax – Stainless steel wire not covered within entry (ix) of clause (iv) of S. 14 of CST Act
Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s. Bansal Wire Industries Ltd. & Anr Vs. State of U.P. & Ors (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The language used in entry no. (ix) is plain and unambiguous and that the items which are mentioned there are “tools, alloy and special steel”. By using the words “of any of the above categories” in entry Nos. (ix) would refer to entries (i) to (viii) and it cannot and does not refer to entry no (xv).
However, entry (xvi) of Clause (iv) would be included in entry (xvi) particularly within the expression now therein any of the aforesaid categories. It is a settled principle of law that the words used in the section, rule or notification should not be rendered redundant a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

