Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

In a recent decision of Gujarat High Court in case of Munjaal Manishbhai Bhatt vs UoI & ors. High Court held that value of land can be excluded from levy of GST if contractual arrangement specifically states the land value. Thereby no requirement to apply deeming 1/3 value exclusion from the sale consideration and charge tax only on the actual consideration for construction services. Brief summary of the decision is as follows:

A.  Brief Facts

  • Munjaal Manishbhai Bhatt (Petitioner) entered into an agreement with Navratna Organisers & Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Developer) for purchase of plot of land admeasuring about 1021 square meters.  The petitioner submitted that while the plot size is 1021 sq. mts. the built up area (constructed area) amounted to 160 sq. mts.
  • Separate and distinct consideration was agreed upon between the parties for the sale of land and construction of a bungalow on the land.
  • The Petitioner was of the view that GST was supposed to be payable only on the consideration payable for construction service.
  • However, developer, on relying upon entry 3(if) of Notification No. 11/2017 CT (Rate) (impugned notification) read with para 2 of the said notification, was of the view that GST was payable on entire consideration payable for land and construction service after deducting 1/3rdvalue of land in accordance with para 2 of the impugned notification.
  • Hence the petitioner filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court.

B.  Question before High Court

  • Whether the mandatory deeming fiction as provided under para 2 of the impugned notification, presuming land value to be 1/3rdof the actual consideration charges irrespective of availability of actual value of land is ultra vires the GST Act?

C.  Observation of the Court

  • Hon’ble Gujarat High Court observed that in terms of Section 15 of the CGST Act, ordinarily value of supply shall be the actual price paid or payable.
  • In the present case there is a specific/ distinct consideration agreed for sale of land and construction service.
  • Deeming fiction can only be applied in case where actual price of land is not ascertainable.
  • The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court took into account the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gannon Dunkerley, which held that if the actual value is available then the same was to be deducted and if the actual value is not ascertainable then the deeming fiction could be applied to.
  • Thus, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court observed that mandatory application of deeming fiction of 1/3rd of total agreement value towards land even though the actual value of land is ascertainable is clearly contrary to the provisions and scheme of the CGST Act and therefore ultra-vires the statutory provisions.

D.  The Way Forward

  • For the past transactions home owners could apply for refund for excess payment of tax.
  • In case the incidence of tax is not passed on to the home owners, developer/ builder can claim refund
  • Builder could pay tax on deemed value i.e 1/3 value under protest.

This is welcome judgment at the cusp when inflation and rising real cost could be balanced with reduction of tax cost.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information existing at the time of preparation and we take no responsibility to update it with the subsequent changes in the law. The article is intended as a news update and Affluence Advisory neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this article. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on specific facts and circumstances. This article does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Affluence Advisory Pvt. Ltd. is established with the vision to provide one stop solutions to clients’ needs in ever changing environment. Affluence is managed by a specialized team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, Corporate Lawyers, and Other Professionals committed to provide a q View Full Profile

My Published Posts

India’s Startup Boom Transforming Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth The Ultimate Guide to Resume Crafting and Interview Success Employees Not Liable for Employer’s TDS Mismanagement Probate, LoA and Succession Certificate RBI Urges NBFCs to Focus on Compliance & Risk Management View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. vswami says:

    For anyone to say or believe, or imprudently induce any other to so do, – that either this Guj, HC Judgment or the earlier SC Judgment has provided any fool proof mechanism or solution, – may be found to offend own capability to think or understand the puzzle the controversy entails. For a proper appreciation of the inherent riddle /irresolute problem, it needs to be borne in mind that total invoice price of seller /supplier comprises , besides cost(or FMV) of land and construction cost, a mark up for ‘profit’ . For more, do not skirt but do consider the related Pr. Post(s) on this website itself, so also on FB and Linkedin !?
    Courtesy

  2. OM PRAKASH JAIN says:

    Sir,
    In the recent Supreme court decision in the case of Union of India v. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 37 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR 441, the Hon’ble Supreme court permitted issuance of notfn for determination of value u/s 15, GST Act, 2017 to create a workable mechanism under delegated legislation. It has been further held that in case issuance of notfn for determination of value u/s 15, GST Act, 2017 is not permitted taking shelter of S.2(87), then it would be “unduly restrictive interpretation of S.2(87).
    In view of the above, whether the ratio decidendi of Gujarat High Court is tenable?
    CA Om Prakash Jain s/o J.K.Jain, Jaipur
    Tel:9414300730

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031