Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Yogesh Rajendra Mehra Vs Principal Commissioner CGST & Central Excise (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 1632 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/02/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Yogesh Rajendra Mehra Vs Principal Commissioner CGST & Central Excise (Bombay High Court)

Introduction: In a landmark decision, the Bombay High Court in Yogesh Rajendra Mehra Vs Principal Commissioner CGST & Central Excise, addressed the critical issue of procedural deficiencies in filing appeals against orders regarding the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) refunds. This ruling underscores the court’s stance on ensuring that substantive rights are not overshadowed by procedural lapses, especially when appeals are filed within the prescribed period of limitation.

Detailed Analysis: Yogesh Rajendra Mehra, the petitioner, faced a denial of his CGST refund claim due to a mistake of filing tax returns under both old and new GST registration numbers. Upon rejection of his refund application by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, and subsequent appeal dismissal by the Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Excise & Service Tax on grounds of being time-barred, Mehra approached the Bombay High Court seeking justice.

The High Court meticulously examined the case’s merits, emphasizing that the petitioner’s initial registration was cancelled, and a new one was issued. The petitioner erroneously filed returns and paid taxes under both registrations due to an oversight by his Chartered Accountant. This led to a legitimate claim for a refund of taxes paid under the cancelled registration, which was initially rejected by the tax authorities.

The appellate authority’s decision to reject the petitioner’s appeal on the technical ground of limitation, despite it being filed online within the prescribed period, was scrutinized. The High Court highlighted that procedural deficiencies, such as the failure to file physical documents or comply with document upload requirements, should not invalidate an appeal filed within the limitation period. The court emphasized that procedural requirements cannot trump substantive rights, especially regarding legal remedies and access to justice.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031