Case Law Details
Thales India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST (Delhi High Court)
The case of Thales India Private Limited vs Commissioner of CGST came before the Delhi High Court, challenging the Order-in-Appeal dated 16.02.2022. The appeal, filed by the Respondent Assistant Commissioner, resulted in the setting aside of the Order-in-Original dated 04.11.2020. The key issue revolves around the nature of services provided by Thales India.
The Appellate Authority noted that understanding the nature of services requires examination of service agreements between Thales India and foreign clients. However, crucial agreements were absent in the Appellate Authority’s records. The respondent’s counsel argued that the petitioner had annexed sample agreements during the proceedings. Due to the absence of essential documents, the Appellate Authority faced challenges in determining the exact nature of Thales India’s services.
Considering these factors, the Delhi High Court set aside the Order-in-Appeal dated 16.02.2022. The matter was remitted to the Appellate Authority with instructions for Thales India to submit copies of agreements with foreign entities. The Appellate Authority is directed to reconsider the issue and issue a fresh order on the appeal, providing an opportunity for a personal hearing to the petitioner.
The judgment highlights the importance of comprehensive documentation in tax-related matters. The absence of crucial agreements impacted the Appellate Authority’s decision. Thales India is now required to furnish essential documents for a fair reconsideration of the case. This case serves as a reminder of the significance of maintaining complete records in legal proceedings related to taxation matters.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT
1. Petitioner impugns Order-in-Appeal dated 16.02.2022 whereby the appeal filed by the Respondent Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax has been accepted and Order-in-Original dated 04.11.2020 has been set aside. The Appellate Authority has noticed that the issue pertains to the nature of services being provided by the Petitioner. The Appellate Authority records that the nature of services could be known from the service agreements entered into by the Petitioner with foreign clients. However, none of the said agreements were available on the records of the Appellate Authority.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Petitioner with these proceedings has annexed some sample agreements. Further, she submits that since the core issue involves the nature of the services which are provided by the Petitioner and in the absence of the documents being on record, the Appellate Authority was constrained in determining the exact nature of petitioner’s services. She submits that the matter could be remitted to the Appellate Authority with liberty to the Petitioner to place all such agreements on record and for the Appellate Authority to reconsider the issue.
3. In view of the above, the Order –in- Appeal dated 16.02.2022 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the Appellate Authority. Petitioner shall place on record of the Appellate Authority copies of the agreements, entered into between the Petitioner and the foreign entities, that it seeks to rely upon. Thereafter, the Appellate Authority shall reconsider the issue and pass a fresh order on the appeal filed by the respondents after giving an opportunity of a personal hearing to the Petitioner.
4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Author Bio
