Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sahil Jain Vs Superintendent (Anti Evasion) (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sahil Jain Vs Superintendent (Anti Evasion) (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The Punjab and Haryana High Court adjudicated a petition filed under Section 484 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of a bail condition requiring the furnishing of a bank guarantee or fixed deposit receipt (FDR) of ₹50 lakhs. The petitioner contended that the earlier surety had withdrawn and that he was financially incapable of complying with the condition. Read SC Judgment in this case: SC Set Aside ₹50 Lakh Bail Condition as Excessive Despite Prior HC Approval in FAKE invoice Case The petiti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031