Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Midas Foods (P) Ltd (GST AAR Uttarakhand)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. 10/2020-21
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/10/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Midas Foods (P) Ltd (GST AAR Uttarakhand)

(a) Whether Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term ‘intermediary’ as provided under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017;

Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term intermediary’ as provided under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017;

(b) Whether services received by applicant from the Overseas Commission Agent falls within the meaning of the term ‘import of services’ as provided under section 2(11) of the IGST Act, 2017;

Services received by applicant from the Overseas Commission Agent do not fall within the meaning of the term ‘import of services’ as provided under section 2(11) of the IGST Act, 2017;

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031