In the bustling ecosystem of India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, seamless transactions are the norm, but delays in payments can disrupt cash flows and strain relationships between suppliers and buyers. As a GST-registered service provider, if you’ve delivered services to another registered entity yet remain unpaid, a common question arises: Can you lodge a complaint on the GST portal to enforce recovery? The short answer is no—but there’s a strategic workaround involving Input Tax Credit (ITC) compliance that could indirectly pressure the defaulter. This article explores your options, drawing from GST laws and practical insights, to empower you in resolving such disputes.
At its core, non-payment of an invoice—comprising the principal amount plus GST—is treated as a civil commercial matter, not a direct tax violation warranting government intervention for recovery. The GST portal’s grievance redressal system, accessible via selfservice.gstsystem.in, is tailored for compliance hurdles like return filing errors, technical glitches, or government dues—not private debt collection. Filing a complaint here for unpaid services risks dismissal, as the department views it outside their purview.
However, GST’s interconnected framework offers a silver lining through Rule 37 of the CGST Rules, 2017. This provision mandates that buyers must reverse any ITC claimed on your supply if full payment (including GST) isn’t received within 180 days of the invoice date. Failure to do so exposes the buyer to interest at 18% per annum and penalties under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act for wrongful availment. Essentially, while authorities won’t chase your dues, they can scrutinize the buyer’s returns for ITC mismatches, turning the tables on the defaulter.
To activate this mechanism, proactive reporting is key. Start by approaching your jurisdictional GST officer—locate them via the portal’s “Search Taxpayer” tool or the helpline (1800-103-4786). Submit a detailed written representation, including the invoice copy, buyer’s GSTIN, proof of service delivery, and non-payment evidence. Frame it as an ITC reversal violation rather than a payment demand. Anecdotal successes from taxpayers highlight that this prompts audits, notices, and potential recoveries from the buyer to rectify their tax position.
Alternatively, utilize the portal’s general grievance module under Services > User Services > Lodge a Grievance. Categorize it as “ITC related issues” or “Others,” detailing the 180-day lapse and referencing Section 16(2). You’ll receive a reference number for tracking. Post-submission, monitor the buyer’s GSTR-2A/2B on the portal to verify ITC reversal; discrepancies bolster your case.
Will the GST department act decisively? On compliance, yes—they may issue show-cause notices and impose penalties, compelling the buyer to settle to avoid escalating liabilities. Yet, direct recovery of your invoice remains off-limits; Sections 79’s recovery powers apply solely to government tax shortfalls, not inter-business obligations.
For holistic resolution, integrate GST levers with civil remedies. Dispatch a formal legal notice via registered post, invoking the 180-day rule and demanding payment within 15-30 days. If ignored, escalate to a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure—ideal for undisputed debts, with expedited hearings in commercial courts. Arbitration clauses in contracts can streamline this further, while smaller claims (under ₹2 lakh) suit consumer forums.
In conclusion, while the GST portal isn’t a debt recovery tribunal, leveraging ITC rules transforms non-payment from a mere grievance into a compliance trigger. This approach not only safeguards your revenue but underscores GST’s self-policing ethos. Always consult a chartered accountant or lawyer for tailored guidance, mindful of the three-year limitation under the Limitation Act. By blending tax savvy with legal acumen, suppliers can navigate these waters effectively, ensuring payments flow as freely as services rendered.
Author Bio
