Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Drs Marine Services Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Appeal Number : Advance Rulling No. GST-AAR-34/2018-19/B-99
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Drs Marine Services Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)

The applicant is a Crew Recruitment and Placement Agency, and are involved in selecting and recruiting shipping personnel on behalf of their principal/client who is a Foreign Ship Owner and for which they are charging Administration fees and paying GST on such Administration charges so received. The applicant has submitted that their principal has requested them for disbursal of salary to the crew members from the applicant’s side, for which the principal would be transferring the sum of total salary to the applicant who in turn will be disbursing the salary to the crew member through banking channels into their respective accounts. For this activity, the applicant would be charging/ invoicing service charges to the principal and on the said charges they would be discharging their GST liability.

Applicant has further submitted that the above said activity of distributing salaries would be done on behalf of their Foreign Principal & they would not be deducting any charges from the amount of salary received for disbursement. Hence, they have contended that, the amount so remitted towards disbursal of salary would not be taxable under GST in view of provisions of Rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

From a reading of points 2.5 and 3 of the Addendum #5 submitted by the applicant it is clear that the Salary of Crews of RMS will be deposited in the account of the applicant in one go and the same will be transferred from the applicant’s account directly to the bank accounts of the Crews, by the bank, on the directions of the applicant. Here we find that the entire amount received by the applicant from RMS towards salary of crews is disbursed as such. Hence with respect to this transaction it is crystal clear that the applicant is acting as a pure agent of RMS. Here it is to reiterate that the amounts that are to be transferred to this account have to be genuinely in respect of salary of crew as discussed and no other amounts which are not authorized and due as salary can be handled through this account by the applicant.

From the provisions of Rule 33 and the facts of the proposed transaction explained by the applicant, we find that the applicant will be acting as a pure agent of RMS in as much as the entire amount received by them as Crews’ Salary will be disbursed to the Crew and no amounts from the said receipt will be used by the applicant for his own interest. In fact, for performing as a pure agent they will also be receiving compensation separately in the form of fixed fees to be charged as service charges.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031