Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subramaniam Senthil Kumar Vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.No.24308 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/09/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Subramaniam Senthil Kumar Vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)

In the case of Subramaniam Senthil Kumar Vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise before the Madras High Court, the petitioner challenged the cancellation of his GST registration due to failure to file returns for six months. The petitioner claimed that personal and family issues had hindered his ability to run his proprietorship and file returns, leading to the cancellation order. He argued that he was not given an opportunity to be heard, and due to these personal difficulties, he had missed responding within the prescribed time and could not appeal within the six-month limitation period. He also clarified that he had no tax liabilities and had since filed all outstanding returns up until December 2023.

The respondent’s counsel maintained that the cancellation was due to the petitioner’s prolonged non-compliance with GST filing requirements. However, the court found the reasons provided by the petitioner to be genuine. It acknowledged the petitioner’s circumstances and issued an order for the cancellation to be revoked, provided that all returns were filed up to date. The court directed the GST Network (GSTN) to allow the petitioner to file pending returns and make necessary tax payments, including any fines or penalties, within four weeks. This order paved the way for the petitioner to resume his GST compliance without further hindrance.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 07.10.2021, passed by the respondent, cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner, and further to direct the respondent to restore the GST certificate.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, due to personal reasons, the petitioner was unable to run the proprietorship firm properly and stopped filing GST Returns from the month of February 2022. During the said period, the petitioner had not checked the GST portal. While this being so, he was shocked to know that without giving him an opportunity of hearing, the respondent had cancelled his GST Registration by way of impugned order dated 20.03.2023. Further, due to certain family problems, he has not furnished any reply to the respondent within the stipulated time. He was also unable to prefer the statutory appeal within the limitation period of 6 months as stipulated in the TNGST Act, 2017. He would further submit that he has no tax liability payable to the respondent-Department and has also filed all the un-filed GST Returns upto the month of December 2023. Therefore, the learned counsel prays for the issuance of appropriate order.

3. On the other hand, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner did not file Returns for a continuous period of six months, which led to the passing of the impugned order. He further submitted that the revocation of the cancellation of registration will be considered only upon verification of filed Returns.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5. Admittedly, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled due to non-compliance in filing Returns, attributed to the unprecedented impact of the personal problems. Furthermore, the petitioner claims that he was unaware of the notices and communications sent through the GST Portal. Therefore, this court is of the view that the reason provided by the petitioner for non­compliance with the relevant provisions of the Act within the stipulated time appears to be genuine.

6. In view of the above, this Court issues the following directions:

i. Since the petitioner has already filed all the Returns upto date, the cancellation of the registration stands revoked.

ii. The respondent shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the Returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(iii) The petitioner is directed to file all the Returns for the period till date along with tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Orissa HC Allows GST Registration Revival on Dues Settlement ITAT Allows Timely Employer PF/ESI Contributions Deduction Lifting of Bank Account Attachment under GST: SC Ruling Explained Rajasthan HC Quashes Reassessment Order in Search Case Calcutta HC Stays Section 148 Notice in Anup Kumar Case View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031