Case Law Details
Jinsasan Distributors Vs Commercial Tax Officer (CT) (Madras High Court)
Introduction: The case of Jinsasan Distributors vs. Commercial Tax Officer (CT) adjudicated by the Madras High Court addresses a pivotal issue concerning the reversal of input tax credit in instances where the selling dealer’s registration is retrospectively cancelled. This judgment holds significant implications for registered dealers under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (TNVAT Act, 2006), particularly concerning the availing and reversing of input tax credits on purchased goods. The court’s interpretation of the relevant provisions of the TNVAT Act, 2006 provides critical insight into the rights and obligations of registered dealers in such scenarios.
Detailed Analysis
The controversy centers on the petitioners, who are registered dealers engaged in the purchase and sale of tax-paid goods. They availed input tax credit on purchases made from other registered dealers, as permitted under Section 19 of the TNVAT Act, 2006. However, the commercial tax department initiated actions against the selling dealers, leading to the cancellation of their registration certificates. This prompted the department to issue notices and orders for the reversal of input tax credits availed by the petitioners, arguing that such reversals were necessitated by the cancellation of the sellers’ registration certificates.
The petitioners contested these actions, asserting that the reversal of input tax credits based on the retrospective cancellation of the sellers’ registration certificates was erroneous. They relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in State of Maharashtra v. Suresh Trading Company, which held that the retrospective cancellation of a selling dealer’s registration certificate could not affect transactions made in reliance on the validity of that certificate at the time of the transaction.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
