Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Kumar Singhal Vs Deputy Commissioner (Calcutta High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandip Kumar Singhal Vs Deputy Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) High Court held that that provision of Section 129(3) of the Act would not be invoked to subject a godown premises to search and seizure operation. For invoking Section 67 of the Act existence of reasons to believe to subject the premises to search and seize goods is mandated. Here, the authority is vacillating between Section 67 and 68; whether the goods are in transit or in the godown. In the case at hand it does not appear that the authority acted in accordance with the appropriate legal provisions and instead penalised the p...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930