Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Goods cannot be seized from godown by invoking section 129 of CGST Act

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2022 taxguru.in 4005
Case Name
Mahavir Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Mahavir Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Mahavir Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of U.P. And 2 others [Writ Tax No. 57 of 2020 and Writ Tax No. 58 of 2020 dated August 6, 2022] quashed the orders of the GST officials for seizing the goods of the assessee inside the godown without jurisdiction. The court also directed the Commissioner Commercial Tax UP to look into the matter, and take appropriate action commensurate to the misconduct, if any.

Facts:

Mahavir Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) is a manufacturer of PVC pipes and it has established its manufacturing unit at Tehsil-Kirawali, Agra. They store all its raw materials and manufactured goods at a godown located on the same premises.

The business premises of the Petitioner was subjected to a search and seizure operation by the Special Investigation Branch (“SIB”) of the Commercial Tax Department, Agra dated August 7, 2018 and described them as “Vahan Sankhiya UPGODOWN02” and “Vahan Sankhiya GODOWON”. A Panchnama was drawn on the same day mentioning the allegation of shortage of physical stocks as compared to that recorded in the stock registers.

Show cause notices dated August 9, 2018 and August 14, 2018 (“SCNs”) were issued by the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad), Unit-II Agra, and Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad) -5 Agra (“the Department”) respectively under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) with respect to “Vahan Sankhiya GODOWON“. Accordingly, seizure orders had been passed demanding tax and penalties.

Therefore, the Petitioner filed two writ petitions for the same.

Issue:

Whether the goods were seized without jurisdiction?

Held:

The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad in Writ Tax No. 57 of 2020 and Writ Tax No. 58 of 2020 dated August 6, 2022, held as under:

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,912

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.