Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Arthanarisamy Senthil Maharaj (GST AAR Tamilnadu)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. 07/ARA/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Arthanarisamy Senthil Maharaj (GST AAR Tamilnadu)

The case discussed before the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Tamil Nadu revolves around the admissibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on a Rotary Parking System. Let’s break down the key points and findings.

The applicant sought a ruling on whether they could claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) on a Rotary Parking System, which they intended to install on their premises for providing parking facilities to tenants and customers.

The applicant argued that since the parking system was detachable and solely intended for business purposes, it should be eligible for ITC under relevant sections of the GST Act.

They provided invoices detailing the purchase of constituent parts of the parking system and argued that it should be considered separate from the building, hence not falling under the category of works contract services.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031