- Editor
- | Goods and Services Tax - Judiciary |
- 13 Feb 2020
- 6,327 Views
- 0 comment
Case Law Details
Case Name : Amar Cars Private Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Special Civil Application No. 4025 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/02/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts Gujarat High Court
Amar Cars Private Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
In this case in which GST department has raised Interest Demand on Gross GST without considering the Input Tax Credit, Hon’ble Court has directed the department to not to take any coercive steps for the purpose of recovery of the interest.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable on 11.03.2020.
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicant and having gone through the materials on record, we direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps for the purpose of recovery of the interest.
To be heard along with Special Civil Application No.18198 of 2019. Direct service is permitted
Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Whatsapp
GROUP LINK
Join us on Telegram
GROUP LINK
More Under Goods and Services Tax
Latest Posts
- Requirement of Filing DIR-12 for Reappointment of Directors
- Courts’ Labeling of Minor Marital Disputes as ‘Cruelty’ Poses Risks to Many Marriages: Allahabad HC
- Addition towards unexplained cash credit deleted as AO failed to conduct independent inquiry
- Seizure of ‘Cash’ and ‘other Valuable Assets’ under GST- Not Valid !
- Notice set aside as reasonable opportunity of reply not granted
- AO not entitled to commence proceedings for reassessment based on change of opinion
- Appeal filing limit not extended as petitioner failed to exercise right of appeal within prescribed time limit
- DNA Test Only if No Other Legal Basis To Determine Parentage: Allahabad HC
- Delhi HC Set-Aside Order with Unspecified GST Registration Cancellation Reasons
- Non-striking on irrelevant limb u/s 271(1)(c) vitiates entire penalty proceedings
Popular Posts
- High court reduces GST Penalty from Rs. 56,00,952 to Rs. 10000
- How to Deal with GSTR-2A & GSTR-3B Mismatch Notices: FY 2017-18 to 2018-19 Guide
- Deduction from Capital Gain on Transfer of Capital Assets other than Residential House Property (Section 54F)
- Denial of ITC for difference in GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B for tax period 2017-2018 unsustainable
- ICAI issues Guidelines for using the new CA India logo for CA members
Featured Posts
- ICAI issues Guidelines for using the new CA India logo for CA members
- Income tax FAQs on discard ITR
- Incomplete ‘Saptapadi’ Invalidates Marriage: Patna HC Landmark Judgment
- NFRA Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Penalty, 5-Year Debarment on MAN Industries’ Auditor
- No provision for re-evaluation of answer scripts in Cost Accountancy exams: HC